4.3 Article

DNA barcoding of fish species from the Mediterranean coast of Israel

Journal

MEDITERRANEAN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 459-466

Publisher

NATL CENTRE MARINE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.12681/mms.1384

Keywords

COI barcoding; sequence-based classification; Lessepsian migration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurately classified genomic data in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) database is vital to protecting and conserving marine biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea. The taxonomic classifications of 468 fish of 50 Mediterranean species were analyzed using the BOLD Identifier tool for variation in the mitochondrial gene encoding cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI). Within species, nucleotide maximum composite likelihood was low with a mean of 0.0044 +/- 0.0008. Three presumptive species had significantly higher values: Arnoglossus spp. (0.07), Torquigener flavimaculosus (0.013) and Boops boops (0.028). However, the Arnoglossus spp. samples were subclassified into two groups that were ultimately identified as two different species: Arnoglossus laterna and Arnoglossus thori. For the different species, BLAST searches against the BOLD database using our DNA barcoding data as the query sequences categorized the most similar targets into groups. For each analyzed species, the similarity of the first and second threshold groups ranged from 95 to 99% and from 83 to 98%, respectively. Sequence-based classification for the first threshold group was concordant with morphology-based identification. However, for 34 analyzed species (68%), overlaps of species between the two threshold groups hampered classification. Tree-based phylogenetic analysis detected more than one cluster in the first threshold group for 22 out of 50 species, representing genetic subgroups and geographic origins. There was a tendency for higher conservation and a lower number of clusters in the Lessepsian (Red Sea) migrant versus indigenous species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available