4.2 Review

Direct reciprocity among humans

Journal

ETHOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eth.13407

Keywords

direct reciprocity; evolution of cooperation; evolutionary game theory; human behavior; reciprocal altruism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct reciprocity is the tendency to repay others' cooperation, which is crucial for maintaining cooperation in evolving populations. Theoretical models can well describe when people cooperate, but have difficulties in predicting strategies in indefinitely repeated games.
Direct reciprocity is the tendency to repay others' cooperation. This tendency can be crucial to maintain cooperation in evolving populations. Once direct reciprocity evolves, individuals have a long-run interest to cooperate, even if it is costly in the short run. The major theoretical framework to describe reciprocal behavior is the repeated prisoner's dilemma. Over the past decades, this game has been the major workhorse to predict when reciprocal cooperation ought to evolve, and which strategies individuals are supposed to adopt. Herein, we compare these predictions with the empirical evidence from experiments with human subjects. From a theory-driven perspective, humans represent an ideal test case, because they give researchers the most flexibility to tailor the experimental design to the assumptions of a model. Overall, we find that theoretical models describe well in which situations people cooperate. However, in the important case of indefinitely repeated games, they have difficulties to predict which strategies people use. The prisoner's dilemma.image

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available