Journal
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 291, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108430
Keywords
Plankton; Purification function; Nursery function; Salt-and freshwater marshes; Food web
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigates the diversity and abundance of planktonic communities in two marshes. It found that the freshwater marsh had higher planktonic diversity than the saltwater marsh. The planktonic communities were dominated by Cryptophyta, nanoflagellates, and Cyanobacteria in both marshes, while the metazooplanktonic communities were characterized by marine copepods and freshwater Cladocerans and Rotifera. Periodic water renewals were the only management action that could potentially affect the seasonal dynamics of planktonic communities.
Coastal marshes are submitted to huge management due to anthropogenic pressure and thus, it is essential to preserve their biodiversity, their ecological functions and the ecosystem services they can provide. This study investigates the diversity and abundance of planktonic communities (heterotrophic prokaryotes, heterotrophic protists, microphytoplankton and metazooplankton). The aim of this study is to provide a first quantitative in-ventory on the plankton communities present in two marshes and to construct the different typologies of planktonic food webs in these marshes. Seasonal samplings (4) for environmental variables, nutrient concen-trations and planktonic communities were conducted at 2-3 stations on each marsh during a year. A total of five different types of planktonic food web were determined, three of them were found in both marshes. The salt -marsh phytoplanktonic communities were dominated by Cryptophyta, nanoflagellates and Cyanobacteria. The freshwater marsh was dominated by Cryptophyta in autumn and winter and by a diverse phytoplankton com-munity in spring. Marine copepods (Calanoida and Harpacticoida) characterized the saltwater metazooplank-tonic communities, Cladocerans and Rotifera the freshwater ones. Overall, the planktonic diversity was higher in the freshwater marsh (102 taxa) than in the saltwater marsh (54 taxa). Phytoplankton blooms represented nutrient and CO2 uptake in both marshes and this purification function seemed most efficient in autumn in the saltmarsh. Considerable zooplankton communities represented a po-tential for nursery. Of the three management actions performed, only periodic water renewals might affect the seasonal dynamics of planktonic communities.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available