4.6 Article

Microplastic ecology: Testing the influence of ecological traits and urbanization in microplastic ingestion by sandy beach fauna

Journal

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 290, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108406

Keywords

Marine litter; Plastic; Feeding ecology; Habitat; Trophic guild

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sandy beaches are ideal models for comparative studies on MP ingestion because they are both sources and sinks of plastics, while accommodating multiple species with different traits. The concentration and richness of suspected microplastics (SMP) in beach macroinvertebrates and fishes vary according to urbanization, feeding modes, and habitat. Our results suggest that deposit-feeder macroinvertebrates from the supralittoral can be used as indicators of microplastic pollution in sandy beaches.
Sandy beaches are sources and sinks of plastics, and multiple species with different individual traits coexist. Thus, this ecosystem can be considered ideal model for comparative studies on MP ingestion by organisms from different ecological guilds. We aimed to investigate whether the suspected microplastic (SMP) concentration and richness (number of SMP morphotypes and colors) in beach macroinvertebrates and fishes vary according to urbanization, feeding modes and habitat. Among macroinvertebrates, the highest abundance of SMP was found in deposit-feeder species, in the supralittoral zone, and in high-urbanized beaches. However, the highest SMP richness was observed in carnivorous species from surf zones. Among fish, the highest abundance of SMP was found in pelagic planktivores. The proportion of SMP morphotypes varied significantly between abiotic and biotic compartments, suggesting selectivity in particle ingestion or excretion. Our results support the use of deposit-feeder macroinvertebrates from the supralittoral as indicator of MP pollution in sandy beaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available