4.4 Article

Model selection with baryonic acoustic oscillations in the Lyman-α forest

Journal

EPL
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/acf60c

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent release of the final survey on Lyman-alpha baryonic acoustic oscillation measurements provides significant data for studying cosmic geometry. The results rule out the Milne universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe, and raise doubts about the standard model. The evidence supports the zero active mass condition from general relativity as an essential ingredient in Lambda CDM.
- The recent release of the final, complete survey of Lyman-alpha baryonic acoustic os-cillation measurements provides the most significant and accurate data base for studying cosmic geometry at an effective redshift zeff = 2.334, which is inaccessible to other sources. In this paper, we use these data to select among four distinct cosmologies: Planck Lambda CDM, the Rh = et universe, the Milne universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe. Given the breadth and depth of the Lyman-alpha study, this BAO measurement alone provides a strong model comparison, complementary to previous studies that combined Lyman-alpha data with measurements at lower redshifts. Though both approaches are useful, the latter tends to dilute the disparity between model predictions and the observations. We therefore examine how the models compare to each other strictly based on the BAO scale measured in the Lyman-alpha forest and background quasars. We find that the Milne uni-verse and the Einstein-de Sitter universe are strongly ruled out by these data. There is also strong evidence disfavoring the standard model. The Lyman-alpha measurements are completely consistent with the cosmic geometry predicted by Rh = et. As such, evidence continues to grow that the zero active mass condition from general relativity ought to be an essential ingredient in Lambda CDM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available