4.5 Article

Potential efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate oral loading in patients with epilepsy

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume 64, Issue 9, Pages E190-E193

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17704

Keywords

eslicarbazepine acetate; hyponatremia; oral loading; pharmacokinetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the potential efficacy and safety of ESL oral loading in patients with epilepsy. Results show that most patients achieved therapeutic levels within 12 hours without exceeding the supratherapeutic level throughout the study. Reported adverse effects include gaze-evoked nystagmus and rash, but no serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation occurred.
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) approved as an adjunctive therapy or monotherapy for focal onset seizures. We performed this study to explore the potential efficacy and safety of ESL oral loading in selected patients with epilepsy. Thirty adult patients with status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures were enrolled, and ESL was administered at a single loading dosage of 30 mg/kg. Plasma levels of an active metabolite of ESL, monohydroxy derivative (MHD), were measured at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after ESL oral loading. Two thirds of the patients reached a therapeutic level of MHD 2 h after ESL loading, and most of the patients achieved a therapeutic range within 12 h after loading. Plasma MHD levels did not rise above the supratherapeutic level in any patient throughout the study. The reported adverse effects included one patient with gaze-evoked nystagmus and another patient with a rash. No serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation occurred. There was no discernible difference in sodium levels before and after ESL oral loading. Our study findings suggest that ESL oral loading could be a useful therapeutic option for patients with epilepsy who need rapid elevations in the therapeutic levels of ASMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available