4.8 Article

Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment and Potable Reuse: Energy and Life Cycle Considerations

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 45, Pages 17225-17236

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04517

Keywords

life cycle assessment; anaerobic secondary treatment; staged anaerobic fluidizedmembrane bioreactor; anaerobicdirect potable reuse; post-treatment of anaerobic secondaryeffluent

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaerobic secondary treatment has the potential to achieve energy-positive operations at wastewater treatment plants with lower energy consumption compared to conventional aerobic treatment. Recovering dissolved methane and nutrients and removing sulfide during post-treatment is crucial. Direct potable reuse trains with SAF-MBR show lower energy consumption and life cycle impacts compared to activated sludge, and research on dissolved methane recovery and reduced chemical usage is highlighted for further investigation in anaerobic secondary treatment options.
Anaerobic secondary treatment has the potential to facilitate energy-positive operations at wastewater treatment plants, but post-treatment of the anaerobic effluent is needed to recover dissolved methane and nutrients and remove sulfide. In this study, a life cycle assessment was conducted to compare hypothetical full-scale wastewater treatment trains and direct potable reuse trains that combine the staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR) with appropriate post-treatment. We found that anaerobic wastewater treatment trains typically consumed less energy than conventional aerobic treatment, but overall global warming potentials were not significantly different. Generally, recovery of dissolved methane for energy production resulted in lower life cycle impacts than microbial transformation of methane, and microbial oxidation of sulfide resulted in lower environmental impacts than chemical precipitation. Use of reverse osmosis to produce potable water was also found to be a sustainable method for nutrient removal because direct potable reuse trains with the SAF-MBR consumed less energy and had lower life cycle impacts than activated sludge. Moving forward, dissolved methane recovery, reduced chemical usage, and investments that enable direct potable reuse have been flagged as key research areas for further investigation of anaerobic secondary treatment options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available