4.6 Article

Multifractality of Complex Networks Is Also Due to Geometry: A Geometric Sandbox Algorithm

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e25091324

Keywords

complex networks; fractal networks; models of complex networks; universality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Describing reality using the language of complex networks has become popular and useful. However, existing methods of multifractal analysis only consider the connection between nodes and do not account for their positions in space. This paper proposes a method that takes into account both connections and positions of nodes, and tests it on different geometrical variants of networks.
Over the past three decades, describing the reality surrounding us using the language of complex networks has become very useful and therefore popular. One of the most important features, especially of real networks, is their complexity, which often manifests itself in a fractal or even multifractal structure. As a generalization of fractal analysis, the multifractal analysis of complex networks is a useful tool for identifying and quantitatively describing the spatial hierarchy of both theoretical and numerical fractal patterns. Nowadays, there are many methods of multifractal analysis. However, all these methods take into account only the fact of connection between nodes (and eventually the weight of edges) and do not take into account the real positions (coordinates) of nodes in space. However, intuition suggests that the geometry of network nodes' position should have a significant impact on the true fractal structure. Many networks identified in nature (e.g., air connection networks, energy networks, social networks, mountain ridge networks, networks of neurones in the brain, and street networks) have their own often unique and characteristic geometry, which is not taken into account in the identification process of multifractality in commonly used methods. In this paper, we propose a multifractal network analysis method that takes into account both connections between nodes and the location coordinates of nodes (network geometry). We show the results for different geometrical variants of the same network and reveal that this method, contrary to the commonly used method, is sensitive to changes in network geometry. We also carry out tests for synthetic as well as real-world networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available