4.6 Article

Complexity Synchronization of Organ Networks

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e25101393

Keywords

complexity; synchronization; fractal coding; organ networks; complexity synchronization; scaling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the theory of complexity synchronization in complexity science, quantifying the relative complexity between different complex networks using the multifractal dimensions of organ networks. The research findings indicate that information flows most efficiently when the complexities are equal.
The transdisciplinary nature of science as a whole became evident as the necessity for the complex nature of phenomena to explain social and life science, along with the physical sciences, blossomed into complexity theory and most recently into complexitysynchronization. This science motif is based on the scaling arising from the 1/f-variability in complex dynamic networks and the need for a network of networks to exchange information internally during intra-network dynamics and externally during inter-network dynamics. The measure of complexity adopted herein is the multifractal dimension of the crucial event time series generated by an organ network, and the difference in the multifractal dimensions of two organ networks quantifies the relative complexity between interacting complex networks. Information flows from dynamic networks at a higher level of complexity to those at lower levels of complexity, as summarized in the 'complexity matching effect', and the flow is maximally efficient when the complexities are equal. Herein, we use the scaling of empirical datasets from the brain, cardiovascular and respiratory networks to support the hypothesis that complexity synchronization occurs between scaling indices or equivalently with the matching of the time dependencies of the networks' multifractal dimensions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available