4.7 Article

Composite action in Shallow Steel-beam-Concrete Composite decks

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 286, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116114

Keywords

Shallow Steel-Beam-Concrete Composite decks; Composite slim floor beam; Shear connections; Composite action; Web openings; Flexural capacity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the behavior of Shallow Steel-beam-Concrete Composite (SSCC) decks, focusing on the effect of different Steel-beam-Concrete (SC) bonding measures and techniques on composite action. Through extensive review of experimental tests, it was found that the SC bonding force consists of two components: steel-concrete adhesion in the compression zone and the adopted SC bonding technique. The effectiveness of SC bonding techniques was assessed by comparing experimental tests with numerical simulations, and analytical equations for the bending capacity of SSCC decks with full composite action (FCA) were developed for design purposes.
The behavior of Shallow Steel-beam-Concrete Composite (SSCC) decks, made of steel beam connected to concrete, is the object of this study. Emphasis is placed on the effect that different Steel-beam-Concrete (SC) bonding measures and techniques have on the composite action. An extensive review of several experimental tests showed that the SC bonding force consists of two components: one deriving from the direct steel-concrete adhesion in the compression zone and one dependent on the adopted SC bonding technique. The effectiveness of such SC bonding techniques, which varies from negligible to full composite action (FCA), has been assessed by comparing the experimental tests with numerical simulations having FCA. The closer the test result to the FCA result, the more effective the adopted SC bonding technique. Analytical equations for the bending capacity at yield and ultimate of SSCC decks with FCA have been developed, meant to be adopted in design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available