4.7 Article

Fracture-mechanical crack growth parameters of historical mild steels

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 290, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109517

Keywords

Historical mild steels; Fatigue crack growth; Crack growth threshold; Civil engineering structures

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the early 20th century, numerous steel structures, especially railway bridges, were built in Europe and are still in use. Fracture mechanics is used to assess the safety of these structures in terms of fatigue failure, along with the stress-life concept. This study aims to experimentally determine fracture mechanics parameters for old mild steel in relation to the stress ratio R, compare the results with literature values, and assess different models based on simulated crack growth calculations.
At the beginning of the 20th century, a large number of steel structures were built in Europe. Many of these buildings-especially railway bridges-are still in use. These structures are mainly composed of rimmed steel. In addition to the stress-life concept, fracture mechanics is often used to assess the safety of these structures in terms of fatigue failure. Based on crack propagation calculations, it is possible to determine inspection intervals and, thus, ensure safe operation. For these calculations, suitable parameters of the Paris law, along with threshold values, are needed. The aim of this study is to experimentally determine a wide range of fracture mechanics parameters for old mild steel with reference to the stress ratio R. The experimental results were compared with values from the literature. Furthermore, the experimental results were fitted to several models considering the stress ratio R during crack growth. The investigated models were compared on the basis of the results for simulated crack growth calculations. The models are assessed according to how closely they represent the experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available