4.7 Article

Investigation of subsea oil pipeline rupture

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107415

Keywords

Pipeline; Rupture; Fatigue crack; Longitudinal seam weld; Weld toe; Velocity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current work, a fast-running ductile fracture occurred at an 18-inch offshore pipeline. The pipeline, made of longitudinal seam welded pipe conforming to API 5L Grade X42, ruptured at a depth of 2756 in. from the sea surface. The visual examination revealed that the crack originated at a sharp weld toe angle and propagated along the longitudinal seam weld. Both the internal pressure and external stresses contributed to the crack propagation during the rupture.
In the current work, a full-bore rupture in the form of a fast-running ductile fracture has occurred at an 18-inch offshore pipeline in the subsea portion. The pipeline was constructed from longi-tudinal seam welded pipe conforming to API 5L Grade X42. A subsea survey using the remote operation vehicle showed a pipeline rupture at a depth of 2756 in. from the sea surface. Shiny scratch marks on the outer surface of the pipeline at the rupture location were observed as well. The visual examination revealed that the crack originated at a sharp weld toe angle (149 degrees) at the outer surface. The crack originated in the HAZ region and propagated along the longitudinal seam weld. The rupture origin was a fatigue pre-crack of 0.078-inch depth and 6.7-inch length that propagated at a sharp weld toe angle during the pipeline service life. The stress analysis revealed that the burst was not due to the operation pressure, but rather due to stresses introduced by a sharp tool dragging over the bare pipeline surface. The tool introduced huge external stresses to the pipeline. Both of the internal pressure and the external stresses contributed to the crack propagation during the rupture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available