4.7 Article

Real-time propeller fault detection for multirotor drones based on vibration data analysis

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106343

Keywords

Unmanned aerial vehicles; Fault detection; Signal processing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a real-time fault detection method for dealing with propeller faults on multirotor drones using only the on-board Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data. The proposed method has low computational requirements and achieves a classification accuracy of up to 93.37% (98.21%). It can be easily generalized to other multirotor vehicles and has low space and time complexity.
This article presents a Fault Detection (FD) method to deal with propeller faults on multirotor drones in real-time. Several solutions have been proposed in the literature, however, they depend on additional sensors and/or dedicated hardware to deal with heavy computational complexity. So, they cannot be implemented in off-the -shelf commercial devices, i.e., without the aid of additional on-board sensors and/or extra computational power. The proposed method, instead, requires the on-board Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data only: by combining Finite Impulse Response (FIR), together with sparse classifiers, only a subset of the features is actually needed online and the FD is thus feasible in real-time. Design and tests are based on real flight data from a hexarotor, equipped with a conventional ArduPilot-based controller. The classification accuracy in testing is up to 93.37% (98.21%) with a binary tree (Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM)). Moreover, the space and time complexity of the proposed method is low: on a PixHawk Cube flight controller, it requires less than 2% of the cycle time, and can then run in real-time. Finally, the proposed fault detection solution is model-free and it can be easily generalized to other multirotor vehicles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available