4.7 Article

Double-edged effect of tar on anaerobic digestion: Equivalent method and modeling investigation

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 277, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127738

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion model No; 1; Tar; Kinetic parameters; Mapping relationship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the dual effects of real tar (RT) and synthetic tar (ST) on anaerobic digestion (AD). A mapping relationship between ST and RT was effectively built through an equivalent method. The Anaerobic Digestion Model No.1 (ADM1) was modified and extended by introducing kinetic parameters of tar, leading to an accurate simulation of methane production. The modified ADM1 could help in understanding the AD system both macroscopically and microscopically.
This study investigated the influence of real tar (RT) and synthetic tar (ST) on anaerobic digestion (AD). Mapping relationship was built effectively between ST set and RT set through equivalent method. Both sets performed the double-edged effect on AD: low dosage of tar performed stimulated effect and high dosage caused inhibited effect. Anaerobic Digestion Model No.1 (ADM1) was modified and extended by introducing kinetic parameters (inhibition constant: KI, Monod maximum uptake rate: km, Monod half saturation constant: Ks) of tar to describe related degradation process. Model calibration with ST set data achieved accurate simulation of methane pro-duction with satisfactory R2 (0.80-0.97), and model validation was conducted with RT set data. The linkage between kinetic parameters and microbial community was further bridged. The decrease of km_H2 (km of hydrogen) value was less than km_ac (km of acetate) value, corresponding to the less sensitivity of hydro-genotrophic methanogenesis to tar toxicity as reflected by 16S rRNA. Modified ADM1 could help in under-standing AD system macroscopically and microscopically.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available