4.7 Article

Thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine utilizing ternary CH4/H2/NH3 fuel blends

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 282, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128818

Keywords

Hydrogen combustion; Ammonia combustion; Gas turbine performance; Thermodynamic modeling; Ternary fuel composition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ammonia and hydrogen as fuels can achieve lower carbon emissions in power generation without any retrofitting. This study explores the performance and emissions of ternary fuel blends of methane, hydrogen, and ammonia in gas turbines, and identifies the optimal fuel composition.
Ammonia and hydrogen have gained significant interest as fuels for power generation as part of a larger strategy to decarbonization the power generation sector. By mixing these carbon-neutral fuels with natural gas, lower carbon dioxide emissions can be achieved in gas turbine operations without any retrofitting. However, no studies have explored methane-hydrogen-ammonia ternary fuel blends on gas turbines performance and emissions. In this work, a 50 MW simple Brayton cycle model was developed, incorporating operating conditions found in commercial power plants and chemical equilibrium to represent realistic exhaust temperatures and species. Over 5150 fuel combinations of ammonia-hydrogen-methane were assessed and performance parameters (i.e., system efficiency and specific fuel consumption) are reported. The optimal system efficiency changes with fuel composition, with most ternary fuel blends achieving highest system efficiency at equivalence ratios between 0.37 and 0.39. Gas turbines operating with high ammonia concentrate fuel blends achieve high system efficiencies (up to similar to 44.6%) but result in high specific fuel consumption (up to 0.44 kg.kWh(-1)). The fuel blend of 78%/22% H-2/NH3 was found to be the optimal fuel choice, achieving higher system efficiency with similar fuel consumption as pure methane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available