4.7 Article

Whether the carbon emissions trading system improves energy efficiency-Empirical testing based on China?s provincial panel data

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 275, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127465

Keywords

Carbon emissions trading; Energy efficiency; Difference-in-difference; Green technology innovation; Energy structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving energy efficiency is crucial for China as it faces the challenge of achieving its double carbon goal. The carbon trading system, as a key environmental measure, may have a significant impact on energy efficiency. This study uses a difference-in-difference model to test whether carbon trading systems can improve energy efficiency through a quasi-natural experiment. The results show that both static and dynamic effect analysis support the idea that carbon trading improves energy efficiency.
As China faces the challenge of achieving its double carbon goal, improving energy efficiency is imperative. Carbon trading system may have a significant impact on energy efficiency in China as a key environmental measure. However, few literatures discuss the role of carbon emission trading system from the perspective of energy efficiency. Using the difference-in-difference model to test whether the carbon trading systems can improve energy efficiency through a quasi-natural experiment. The results show that both static and dynamic effect analysis shows that carbon trading improves energy efficiency. The impact mechanism analysis shows that the system improves energy efficiency by adjusting the energy structure and promoting green technology innovation. Finally, the carbon trading system has a greater impact on improving energy efficiency in the field of high environmental law enforcement and environmental quality. There is some evidence that the double carbon goal can be achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available