4.7 Article

Methodology to compare and optimize district heating and decentralized heat supply for energy transformation on a municipality level

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 282, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128987

Keywords

District heating; Energy supply optimization; Archetype approach; Heat supply

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a holistic approach to compare and optimize district heating supply and decentralized heat supply, and concludes that district heating usually has lower levelized costs of heating than decentralized heat supply in specific districts.
The determination of the optimal energy supply system and the selection of energy producers are two major challenges in the energy transformation of districts. This paper addresses these issues, presenting a holistic approach to compare and optimize district heating supply and decentralized heat supply, which is applicable to arbitrary districts. For this purpose, load profiles for space heating, domestic hot water and electricity are generated utilizing an archetype approach and statistical data. To identify the most economic supply variant, optimization models are created, using the Open Energy Modelling Framework. The optimization results are compared and the most economic supply variant is identified. The method is demonstrated with a case study of a district with a heat density of 491.15 kW h/(m2 a), considering different emission reduction targets and energy costs. The results show that, for a district with these properties, district heating has lower levelized costs of heating than decentralized heat supply for 94% of the investigated variants. The difference lies between 0.002 euro/kWh and 0.135euro/kWh, depending on energy prices and emission reduction target. In the future, the developed method will be used to investigate the influence of various district characteristics on the economic efficiency of supply variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available