4.7 Article

Discussion on the potential of methane-hydrogen dual-fueled Wankel rotary engine

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 279, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128121

Keywords

Wankel rotary engine; Hydrogen; Methane; Combustion and emission; Knock

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study discusses the potential of hydrogen/methane dual-fueled rotary engines and finds that compared to pure hydrogen or pure methane fuel, dual-fueled engines can achieve higher thermal efficiency and output power, while also maintaining satisfactory emission performance.
Wankel rotary engine (WRE) is welcomed due to its high power density and compact layout and is criticized due to its low efficiency and poor emission. To develop low-carbon emission and high-efficiency WRE, the present work discusses the potential of hydrogen/methane dual-fueled WRE with varied fuel components. The test was conducted at 1500 r/min, 80 kPa manifold absolute pressure and stoichiometric ratio. The results indicate that compared with pure hydrogen or pure methane WRE, hydrogen/methane dual-fueled WRE can achieve higher thermal efficiency and output power, the maximum values of which are 30.7% and 12.4 kW under test condi-tions, respectively. Besides, it also has satisfactory NO, CO2 and HC emissions. In particular, there is a linear relationship between NO emission and methane volumetric percentage with a 0.9949 determination coefficient in logarithmic coordinates, which means that the NO emission can be easily predicted. In addition, the cyclic variation is acceptable at maximum-efficiency CH4% and the knock can be almost eliminated in hydrogen-methane dual-fueled WRE when the volume ratio of methane exceeds about 40%. In general, WRE is recom-mended to be fueled by a mixture of hydrogen and methane with a high methane volumetric percentage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available