4.5 Article

Limitations Imposed Using an Iodide/Triiodide Redox Couple in Solar-Powered Electrochromic Devices

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 16, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16207084

Keywords

electrochromic; hybrid; redox electrolyte; loss current; stability

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the iodide/triiodide redox couple is used in hybrid electrochromic devices, and the effects of applied bias potential and bias time on device performance are investigated. The results show that an appropriate bias potential and time can enhance the contrast ratio, but excessive values lead to increased loss reactions instead of improving optical performance. Long-term performance is influenced by testing procedure, iodine formation, and electrolyte replacement.
In the present study, an iodide/triiodide (I-/I-3(-)) redox couple is used in hybrid electrochromic devices (ECDs), and the effects of the applied bias potential and bias time on device performance are studied. An applied bias potential of similar to 1 V is sufficient to achieve an initial contrast ratio of 8:1 in less than 5 min. Increasing both the bias potential and bias time results in an enhancement in loss reactions at the WO3/electrolyte interface, rather than improving optical performance. Moreover, long-term performance depends on the testing procedure (regularly cycling or after storage), while the formation of iodine (I-2) decreases the initial transparency of the ECDs and affects their overall performance. However, its formation cannot be avoided, even without cycling the ECDs, and the restoration of the optical performance can take place only when the electrolyte is replaced with a fresh one. Finally, a new methodology is applied for calculating the loss current, and a suggestion is made to avoid a common mistake in calculating the coloration efficiency of these hybrid ECDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available