Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems

Background and study aims Artificial intelligence (AI) based systems for computer-aided detection (CADe) of polyps receive regular updates and occasionally offer customizable detection thresholds, both of which impact their performance, but little is known about these effects. This study aimed to compare the performance of different CADe systems on the same benchmark dataset.Methods 101 colonoscopy videos were used as bench-mark. Each video frame with a visible polyp was manually annotated with bounding boxes, resulting in 129705 polyp images. The videos were then analyzed by three different CADe systems, representing five conditions: two versions of GI Genius, Endo-AID with detection Types A and B, and EndoMind, a freely available system. Evaluation included an analysis of sensitivity and false-positive rate, among other metrics.Results Endo-AID detection Type A, the earlier version of GI Genius, and EndoMind detected all 93 polyps. Both the later version of GI Genius and Endo-AID Type B missed 1 polyp. The mean per-frame sensitivities were 50.63 % and 67.85 %, respectively, for the earlier and later versions of GI Genius, 65.60% and 52.95%, respectively, for Endo-AID Types A and B, and 60.22 % for EndoMind.Conclusions This study compares the performance of dif-ferent CADe systems, different updates, and different con-figuration modes. This might help clinicians to select the most appropriate system for their specific needs.

Automated summary

This study compares the performance of different CADe systems, updates, and configuration modes, providing help for clinicians to select the most appropriate system for their specific needs.