4.5 Article

Influence of the filter grain morphology on separation efficiency in dielectrophoretic filtration

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.202300075

Keywords

DEP filtration; high-throughput dielectrophoresis; insulator-based dielectrophoresis; trapping

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recovering noble materials from waste is crucial for industries worldwide. Dielectrophoretic (DEP) filtration, an electrically switchable particle separation technique, is a promising approach to address this challenge. Improving the efficiency and high throughput capability of DEP filtration is necessary to make it a viable alternative to conventional separation methods.
Recovery of noble materials from waste is essential for industries around the globe. Dielectrophoretic (DEP) filtration, an electrically switchable particle separation technique, can be applied to tackle this challenge. It is highly selective regarding particle size, material or shape. Expanding the scope of DEP towards high throughput and improving the trapping efficiency are vital to make DEP a viable robust alternative to conventional separation methods. DEP filtration works by selective immobilisation of particles in a porous medium by the action of an inhomogeneous electric field. The field inhomogeneity comes from scattering an electric field at the phase boundary between the particle suspension and the filter surface. In this article, we show how the filter structure affects the DEP separation. We study fixed bed filters of three different grain types and find that the morphology of the grains highly influences the DEP filter efficiency. Specifically, grains with irregular surface structure and high perceived angularity show high separation efficiency. We believe these insights into the design of DEP filtration will pave the way towards its application in, for example, the recovery of valuable materials from electronic waste dust.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available