4.5 Review

Research progress on pesticide residue detection based on microfluidic technology

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.202300048

Keywords

detection method; fabrication materials; microfluidic technology; pesticide residue

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of pesticide residue contamination is a concern for human health. Traditional pesticide residue detection methods are not capable of meeting the requirements for rapid and diverse field screening. Microfluidic technology, which integrates sample preparation and detection, shows great potential for quick and accurate high-throughput detection of pesticide residues. This paper reviews the latest research progress, including commonly used microfluidic materials, current detection technology, and future research directions.
The problem of pesticide residue contamination has attracted widespread attention and poses a risk to human health. The current traditional pesticide residue detection methods have difficulty meeting rapid and diverse field screening requirements. Microfluidic technology integrates functions from sample preparation to detection, showing great potential for quick and accurate high-throughput detection of pesticide residues. This paper reviews the latest research progress on microfluidic technology for pesticide residue detection. First, the commonly used microfluidic materials are summarized, including silicon, glass, paper, polydimethylsiloxane, and polymethyl methacrylate. We evaluated their advantages and disadvantages in pesticide residue detection applications. Second, the current pesticide residue detection technology based on microfluidics and its application to real samples are summarized. Finally, we discuss this technology's present challenges and future research directions. This study is expected to provide a reference for the future development of microfluidic technology for pesticide residue detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available