4.6 Article

On the impact of electrolyte temperature on contact glow discharge electrolysis

Journal

ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2023.107542

Keywords

Contact Glow Discharge Electrolysis; CGDE; Temperature control; Environmental chemistry; Ionic conductivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of small temperature drops on Contact Glow Discharge Electrolysis (CGDE). The addition of frozen KOH solution significantly increases the current, while boiling KOH solution has no effect. Similar results are observed with type III deionized water. These findings highlight the importance of electrolyte temperature control for CGDE systems.
This study aims at disclosing the effect of small temperature drops (10-15 degrees C) of the electrolyte on Contact Glow Discharge Electrolysis (CGDE). In our experiments, we measure the temperature change of electrolyte and electrode as well as the change in current following on from the addition of, first, frozen and, second, boiling KOH aqueous solution (0.1 M). Quite surprisingly, only the addition of frozen KOH aqueous solution has a significant impact on current (+130%), caused by the decrease in electrolyte temperature (-11 degrees C). In contrast, the addition of boiling KOH aqueous solution has a negligible effect on current. A very similar behavior is recorded when frozen or boiling type III deionized water is used: the addition of ice has an even stronger impact on current (+145 %) and on electrolyte temperature (-14 degrees C), while adding boiling water has no measurable effect. Thus, we here demonstrated that electrolyte temperature is critical for managing the responsiveness of the CGDE system. Our results pave the way toward temperature controlled CGDE, a powerful tool for a greener and a more efficient environmental chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available