Journal
ECOGRAPHY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.06766
Keywords
biodiversity; circuit theory; Circuitscape; connectivity; conservation; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty; validation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Maintaining and restoring ecological connectivity is crucial for biodiversity conservation. However, the field of connectivity modeling lacks standardized procedures and rigorous validation. This study proposes four steps to improve rigor and utility in connectivity modeling research, and finds a clear need to enhance reliability, reproducibility, and data availability in this field.
Maintaining and restoring ecological connectivity is considered a global imperative to help reverse the decline of biodiversity. To be successful, practitioners need to be guided by connectivity modeling research that is rigorous and reliable for the task at hand. However, the methods and workflows within this rapidly growing field are diverse and few have been carefully scrutinized. We propose four steps that should be consistently undertaken in connectivity modeling studies in order to improve rigour and utility: 1) describe the type of connectivity being modeled, 2) assess the uncertainty and sensitivity of model parameters, 3) validate the model outputs, ideally with independent data and 4) make non-sensitive raw data and code openly available to enhance computational reproducibility. We reviewed the literature to determine the extent to which studies included these four steps. We focused on studies that generated novel landscape connectivity outputs using circuit theory and restricted our assessment to studies concerning terrestrial mammals. Among 181 studies meeting our search criteria, 39% communicated the type of connectivity being modeled, 18% conducted some form of sensitivity or uncertainty analysis (or both), 18% of studies attempted to validate their connectivity model outputs and only 7% used fully independent data to do so. Lastly, 13% of the studies made all raw data available, 2% provided all required code and only two studies provided both. Our findings highlight a clear need and opportunity to improve the reliability, reproducibility and utility of connectivity modeling research. We provide a checklist that researchers can consult and include with outputs. This will help practitioners make more informed decisions and ensure limited resources for connectivity conservation and restoration are allocated appropriately.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available