4.7 Article

The crystallization temperature of granitic pegmatites: The important relationship between undercooling and critical metal prospectivity

Journal

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104541

Keywords

Pegmatite classification; Critical metals; Rare element class; Thermometry Degree of undercooling; Economic potential

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence of crystallization temperature and undercooling on critical metal mineralization in granitic pegmatite deposits. The analysis of a global compilation of naturally-measured crystallization temperatures reveals that large degrees of undercooling are necessary for critical metal mineralization. Different pegmatite families and associated commodities require different petrogenetic processes, and internal pegmatite zoning can be explained by variability in the degree of undercooling.
Granitic pegmatite deposits contain important critical metal resources, but the geologic processes that generate critical metal mineralization in these systems remain enigmatic. Previous research indicates that liquidus undercooling is one of multiple important controls on critical metal mineralization in granitic pegmatites, although other research has suggested that this process may be unnecessary. Here we investigate the influence of crystallization temperature and undercooling on pegmatite-hosted critical metal mineralization using a global compilation of naturally-measured crystallization temperatures from >200 granitic pegmatite occurrences that span various pegmatite classes, geothermometer types, and intrapegmatite zones. Our analysis indicates that pegmatites generally crystallize between 400 and 700 degrees C, many of which crystallize between 400 and 600. C. Pegmatite classes yield the following mean crystallization temperatures (+/- 2SE): abyssal:similar to 670 +/- 50. C, muscovite: similar to 675 +/- 50.C, muscovite-rare element: similar to 535 +/- 25.C, rare element: 525 +/- 20.C, and miarolitic 460 +/- 25.C. These variations indicate that critical metal-mineralized (i.e., rare element and miarolitic classes) pegmatites have a mean liquidus undercooling temperature of similar to 175.degrees C and 240.degrees C, respectively, whereas barren pegmatites crystallize near the hydrous haplogranite solidus. Main-stage zone temperatures for different pegmatite families indicate that Nb-Y-F (NYF; similar to 560 +/- 20.C) pegmatites crystallize at temperatures similar to 50.degrees C higher than Li-Cs-Ta (LCT; similar to 515 +/- 20. degrees C) pegmatites, suggesting that the formation of different pegmatite families and associated commodities requires different petrogenetic processes. In addition, the subdivisions of the rare element class that are associated with different commodities also have different crystallization temperatures, where Li-mineralized pegmatites have a mean crystallization temperature of similar to 510 +/- 25.C compared to Be- and rare earth element (REE)-mineralized pegmatites with mean temperatures of similar to 550 +/- 45. C. In terms of intrapegmatite zoning, crystallization of the border to the core zone (main-stage zones) occurs at near-isothermal mean temperatures (similar to 530-500.C), late-stage zones form at lower temperatures than the former (miarolitic cavities: similar to 420 +/- 45. C, replacement: similar to 465 +/- 55. C), and unzoned, typically unmineralized pegmatites crystallize at relatively high mean temperatures (similar to 680 +/- 55.C). However, albitespodumene pegmatites, an unzoned, occasionally economic-grade rare element pegmatite subclass, have a mean temperature of similar to 490 +/- 70. C. We also speculate that large intrapegmatite temperature variations may be important for forming pegmatite deposits such as the Tanco pegmatite. This study demonstrates that (1) large degrees of undercooling are necessary for pegmatite-forming melts to surpass the mineralogical barrier and host critical metal mineralization, and (2) pegmatite field zonation, or the apparent lack thereof, can be explained by variability in the degree of undercooling throughout a pegmatite field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available