Reproductive performance in gilts submitted to non-steroidal therapies to prolong the luteal phase of the estrous cycle

Synchronized cyclicity of replacement gilts is crucial to optimize breeding herd management, however, protocols with oral progestogen are expensive and require daily administration. This study tested two synchronization protocols without progestogens during the luteal phase in gilts. In Experiment I, on the day of the expression of the third estrus (D0), gilts were assigned to three groups (n = 6, each): control, with no treatment; PGF25: in which gilts received two doses of hCG (1,500 IU each) on D12 and D15 and two doses of a prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF) analogue (sodium cloprostenol; 250 mu g) 6-h apart, on D25; and PGF30: in which gilts received two doses of hCG (1,500 IU each) on D12 and D15 and two doses of the PGF analogue (sodium cloprostenol; 250 mu g) 6-h apart, on D30. The interval between PGF treatment and estrus expression was shorter in PGF30 than in PGF25 (P < 0.01). The PGF treatment failed to decrease serum progesterone (P4) for gilts from the PGF25 group (P > 0.05), but it was effective for gilts in the PGF30 group (P = 0.01). In Experiment II, gilts were assigned to three groups (n = 12, each): control (no treatment); eCG+hCG (400 IU eCG on D10 plus 500 IU hCG on D12); and hCG2 (two hCG doses, 1,500 IU each on D12 and D15). On D30, gilts from eCG+hCG and hCG2 that did not express estrus received two doses of the PGF analogue (250 mu g each, 6-h apart). All gilts were inseminated when estrus was detected. Serum P4 concentrations were similar for all groups on D10 (P > 0.05) and greater on D20 and D25 for gilts in eCG+hCG and hCG2 (P < 0.01) than for those in the control, whereas P4 concentration was greater in hCG2 than in eCG+hCG, on both moments. The inter-estrus interval (IEI) was shorter for control gilts and intermediate for gilts in eCG+hCG, while the longest IEI was observed for gilts in hCG2 (P < 0.01). Total litter size was larger for gilts in the control (P = 0.02) compared to those in hCG2 and did not differ from the other groups for gilts in eCG+hCG (P > 0.05). In conclusion, Experiment I showed that PGF treatment did not induce luteolysis 10 days after the second hCG treatment but it was effective 15 days after the second hCG application. Additionally, Experiment II showed that both eCG+hCG and hCG2 were efficient in prolonging the luteal phase; however, number of piglets born alive and total litter size were negatively affected by the hCG2 protocol. In this sense, treatment with eCG+hCG or hCG2 may represent a steroid-free approach to prolong the luteal phase in gilts, although the doses and number of treatments must be further investigated.

Automated summary

This study tested synchronization protocols without progestogens during the luteal phase in gilts. The results showed that the protocols based on PGF and hCG were effective in reducing the interval between estrus in gilts. Additionally, the hCG2 protocol had negative effects on the number of piglets born alive and total litter size.