4.5 Review

Barriers to equality, diversity and inclusion in research and academia stubbornly persist. So, what are we doing about it?

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

The impact of working in academia on researchers' mental health and well-being: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Helen Nicholls et al.

Summary: This study aims to explore the experiences of academic researchers in their work and how these experiences affect their mental health and well-being. The findings indicate that job insecurity and the high expectations set by the academic system put researchers at risk of poor mental health and well-being. However, access to peer support networks, career progression opportunities, and mentorship can help mitigate the stress associated with the academic job role. Under-represented groups in academia, however, face unequal access to resources, support, and opportunities.

PLOS ONE (2022)

Review Medicine, Research & Experimental

Promoting inclusion in clinical trials-a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action

Danielle H. Bodicoat et al.

Summary: The study identified various barriers to inclusion in clinical trials, such as language, lack of trust, and logistical issues, and highlighted evidence-based strategies like cultural competency training and personalized approaches to address these barriers. Recommendations included improving cultural competence of staff, establishing community advisory panels, and recruiting more staff from under-served groups to enhance representation in clinical trials and improve external validity of findings.

TRIALS (2021)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Effect of Athena SWAN funding incentives on women's research leadership

Pavel V. Ovseiko et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)

Article Biology

A survey of new PIs in the UK

Sophie E. Acton et al.

ELIFE (2019)