4.5 Article

Oral health status and risk of incident diabetes: A prospective cohort study of 213,389 individuals aged 45 and over

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 202, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110821

Keywords

Cohort study; Diabetes mellitus; Epidemiology; Oral health; Periodontitis; Tooth loss

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that oral health status is associated with the risk of developing diabetes, highlighting the importance of oral health screening for diabetes prevention.
Aims: To examine whether simple measures of oral health are associated with incident diabetes.Methods: This prospective cohort study linked data from the 45 and Up Study, Australia, to administrative health records. The study participants were 213,389 men and women, aged & GE;45 years, with no diabetes at baseline. The oral health of participants was assessed by questionnaire. Incident diabetes cases were ascertained based on selfreport in follow-up questionnaires, linked data on medical and pharmaceutical claims, and hospitalisation data up until 2019. The association between oral health and incident diabetes were calculated using multivariable cox proportional hazards models. Results: During 2,232,215 person-years of follow-up, 20,487 (9.6%) participants developed diabetes. Compared with those with & GE;20 teeth, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for incident diabetes was 1.12 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.08, 1.17) for 10-19 teeth, 1.20 (1.14, 1.26) for 1-9 teeth and 1.15 (1.09, 1.21) for no teeth. Compared with those with excellent/very good teeth and gums, the aHR for incident diabetes was 1.07 (1.03, 1.12) for fair and 1.13 (1.07, 1.20) for poor teeth and gums.Conclusions: Simple measures of oral health were associated with risk of developing diabetes, demonstrating the potential importance of oral health screening for diabetes prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available