4.7 Article

Directed differentiation of human hindbrain neuroepithelial stem cells recapitulates cerebellar granule neurogenesis

Journal

DEVELOPMENT
Volume 150, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.201534

Keywords

KEY WORDS; Cerebellum; Granule neuron lineage; Differentiation; Neuroepithelial stem cells; Sonic hedgehog

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study differentiated human hindbrain neuroepithelial stem cells into cerebellar granule neurons (CGNs) in vitro, mimicking their development process and identifying human specific sub-ventricular cell identities. The study also found that sonic hedgehog promotes GABAergic lineage specification and CGN progenitor proliferation. This work provides a new model for studying the development and diseases of the CGN lineage in a human context.
Cerebellar granule neurons (CGNs) are the most abundant neurons in the human brain. Dysregulation of their development underlies movement disorders and medulloblastomas. It is suspected that these disorders arise in progenitor states of the CGN lineage, for which human models are lacking. Here, we have differentiated human hindbrain neuroepithelial stem (hbNES) cells to CGNs in vitro using soluble growth factors, recapitulating key progenitor states in the lineage. We show that hbNES cells are not lineage committed and retain rhombomere 1 regional identity. Upon differentiation, hbNES cells transit through a rhombic lip (RL) progenitor state at day 7, demonstrating human specific sub-ventricular cell identities. This RL state is followed by an ATOH1+ CGN progenitor state at day 14. By the end of a 56-day differentiation procedure, we obtain functional neurons expressing CGN markers GABAAR & alpha;6 and vGLUT2. We show that sonic hedgehog promotes GABAergic lineage specification and CGN progenitor proliferation. Our work presents a new model with which to study development and diseases of the CGN lineage in a human context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available