Improving data quality from routine clinical appointments-Development of a minimum dataset for traumatic dental injuries in children and adolescents

Background/AimsIt is currently difficult to evaluate the success or not of treatment for dental injuries due to poor recording of diagnostic and treatment codes in clinical dentistry. A minimum dataset comprises a standardised minimum set of outcomes along with a specified outcome measurement instrument, to allow aggregated use of data from routine clinical care appointments. This study aimed to determine which outcomes should be included in a minimum dataset for traumatic dental injuries (TDI). Materials and MethodsThis is a three-stage sequential, mixed-methods study, using evidence-based best practice for dataset development. Normalisation process theory informed the development of the study protocols. In Stage 1, semi-structured interviews with patients and their parent or guardian were undertaken to identify outcomes of importance to patients. In Stage 2, an online Delphi survey was undertaken to identify outcomes of importance to clinicians. In Stage 3, a National Consensus Meeting was undertaken involving patient representatives, clinicians and other stakeholders, to agree which outcomes should be included in the minimum dataset. ResultsStage 1: Eleven participants were recruited, five children and six parents. Two key themes emerged from the analysis-communication and aesthetics. In Stage 2, 34 dentists were recruited, and 32 completed both rounds of the survey (97% retention). Most outcomes were deemed by participants to be of 'critical importance', with three outcomes deemed 'important' and none to be 'of limited importance'. In Stage 3, 15 participants took part in the consensus meeting. Participants agreed that the dataset should comprise a list of clinician-important outcomes (pulp healing, periodontal healing, discolouration, tooth loss) and a list of patient-important outcomes (communication, aesthetics, pain, quality of life). ConclusionA Minimum Dataset for TDI has been developed using a robust and transparent methodology.

Automated summary

Poor recording of diagnostic and treatment codes in clinical dentistry makes it difficult to evaluate the success of dental injury treatment. This study used a sequential, mixed-methods approach to determine the outcomes that should be included in a minimum dataset for traumatic dental injuries. Interviews with patients and a Delphi survey with clinicians were conducted to identify important outcomes, and a consensus meeting involving stakeholders was held to finalize the dataset.