4.4 Review

Nanoparticle Polymers Influence on Cardiac Health: Good or Bad for Cardiac Physiology?

Journal

CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102145

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiovascular diseases are a major cause of death and morbidity worldwide. Nanoparticles and nanomaterials are increasingly being used as therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in the field of biomedicine. They can interact with the cardiovascular system in multiple ways, impacting cardiac physiology and cellular death. However, the use of nanoparticles can also lead to cardiotoxicity by increasing reactive oxidative species.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the leading causes of death and morbidity worldwide. Lifestyle modifications, medications, and addressing epidemiological factors have long been at the forefront of targeting therapeutics for CVD. Treatments can be further complicated given the intersection of gender, age, unique comorbidities, and healthcare access, among many other factors. Therefore, expanding treatment and diagnostic modalities for CVD is absolutely necessary. Nanoparticles and nanomaterials are increasingly being used as therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in various disciplines of biomedicine. Nanoparticles have multiple ways of interacting with the cardiovascular system. Some of them alter cardiac physiology by impacting ion channels, whereas others influence ions directly or indirectly, improving cellular death via decreasing oxidative stress. While embedding nanoparticles into therapeutics can help enhance healthy cardiovascular function in other scenarios, they can also impair physiology by increasing reactive oxidative species and leading to cardiotoxicity. This review explores different types of nanoparticles, their effects, and the applicable dosages to create a better foundation for understanding the current research findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available