4.5 Article

Hindlimb musculature of the Lower Cretaceous (Barremian) Therizinosaur Falcarius utahensis (Maniraptora, Theropoda) with implications for evolution, stance, and stride

Journal

CRETACEOUS RESEARCH
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105557

Keywords

Falcarius; Therizinosaurs; Dinosaur muscle reconstruction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reconstructed the hindlimb musculature of the basal therizinosaur Falcarius utahensis using muscle scars, information from extant birds and crocodylians, and models of Tyrannosaurus rex. The results suggested that the evolution of opisthopubic pelvis, muscular changes, avian stance, and mode of walking occurred more than once.
The hindlimb musculature of the basal therizinosaur Falcarius utahensis is reconstructed using observ-able muscle scars, information from extant birds and crocodylians, and current models of Tyrannosaurus rex. Its ancestral phylogenetic position within Therizinosauria based on recent analyses is accepted here. Falcarius is characterized by a propubic pelvis, whereas the more derived therizinosaur Nothronychus had an incipiently opisthopubic pelvis with a highly modified ilium. Therefore, the femur of Falcarius was modelled with a plesiomorphic vertical orientation at rest. The M. caudofemoralis longus was well -developed, indicating a hip-propelled gait, with a sinuous stride. These results strongly suggest that the opisthopubic pelvis, associated muscular changes, avian stance and mode of walking evolved more than once: once within the therizinosaur lineage and once beneath the paravian node. The center of mass would have been located roughly under the acetabulum. Falcarius would have been characterized by a narrow abdomen and a non-waddling gait, in contrast to the more derived Nothronychus, with an inferred knee-based retraction system.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available