4.7 Article

Short-term durability of GFRP stirrups under wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycles

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 398, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132533

Keywords

Wet-dry cycles; Freeze-thaw cycles; GFRP stirrup; Durability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GFRP stirrups are a promising alternative to steel stirrups due to their non-corrosive nature. This study evaluates their tensile strength under wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycles in seawater.
GFRP stirrups are a promising alternative to conventional steel stirrups due to their non-corrosive nature. However, their performance under cyclic exposure to wet-dry and freeze-thaw conditions in seawater needs to be evaluated to ensure their long-term durability and sustainability. This study investigates the tensile strength of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) stirrups under seawater wet-dry cycles and seawater and tap water freeze-thaw cycles. In total, 220 stirrups in two different shapes, i.e. U and L shapes, and two different diameters, i.e. 6 mm and 8 mm were manufactured, conditioned, and tested under stirrup tensile test. Conditioned stirrups were subjected to 9 months and 18 months wet-dry cycles in seawater at 25 & DEG;C, 40 & DEG;C, and 60 & DEG;C, and 9 months and 18 months freeze-thaw cycles in seawater and tap water. At first, the samples underwent a fast deterioration rate, which then decreased as the conditioning period progressed from 9 months to 18 months. The strength retention values of L-shaped stirrups were found to be higher than those of U-shaped stirrups, regardless of the environmental conditions or diameter. The maximum tensile strength reductions of 31%, 28% and 16% were observed, respectively after exposure to 18 months conditioning in seawater wet-dry cycles at 60 & DEG;C, freeze-thaw in seawater, and freeze-thaw in tap water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available