4.7 Article

Dynamic scheduling of multi-memory process flexible job shop problem based on digital twin

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109498

Keywords

Digital twin workshop; Multi -memory process; Flexible manufacturing system; Dynamic scheduling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces digital twin as a newly-emerged enabling technology for intelligent manufacturing and discusses its challenges and requirements. It also proposes a digital twin-driven dynamic scheduling strategy to address the flexible job shop scheduling problem.
Digital twin is one of the newly-emerged enabling technologies for achieving intelligent manufacturing. Based on the physical-digital convergence, digital twin provides manufacturing systems with a new model of collaboration between the workforce and industrial processes. With the characteristics of real-time communication and datadriven enablers, the digital twin scheduling strategy requires close cooperation between workers, systems and processes. However, in the process of digitization and intelligentization, industry will need to face the challenge of supporting new technologies and worker skills development. To this end, the paper considers workers' multimemory process (learning and forgetting) in the flexible job shop scheduling problem (MPFJSP). Meanwhile, the dynamic scheduling strategy of the digital twin-driven MPFJSP is proposed under machine breakdowns aiming at simultaneously minimizing the makespan, total carbon emissions, total production cost and product quality stability. A virtual workshop is adopted to simulate and optimize the dynamic scheduling scheme to realize intelligent workshop scheduling. Finally, a computational experiment is carried out to verify the effectiveness and advantages of the proposed intelligent scheduling strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available