4.7 Article

An aircraft final assembly line balancing problem considering resource constraints and parallel task scheduling

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109436

Keywords

Aircraft final assembly line; Assembly line balancing problem; Resource constraints; Construction and improvement heuristic; approach; Priority rule

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the balancing problem of an aircraft final assembly line (AFAL) is investigated. The objective is to assign assembly tasks to workstations in a way that balances their cycle time and minimizes the resource investment cost. An integer linear programming model is developed and a two-stage heuristic approach is proposed, involving task assignment construction and improvement. The proposed approach outperforms existing methods and its variants, as demonstrated by computational experiments and a real case study.
In this study, the balancing problem of an aircraft final assembly line (AFAL) is investigated. The decision is to assign all the assembly tasks to a given number of workstations, with the objectives to balance the workstation cycle time and to minimize the total resource investment cost. An integer linear programming model is developed to formulate the problem. A construction and improvement based two-stage heuristic approach is proposed to solve this problem. In the first stage, an initial task assignment is constructed based on rules that are evolved by a multi-dimensional archive of phenotypic elites algorithm. In the second stage, an improvement heuristic, consisting of several customized neighborhood operators, is developed to improve the initial task assignment. The proposed approach is compared with the existing methods and its variants. Computational experiments and a real case study reveal the superiority of our proposed approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available