4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

PointMatch: A consistency training framework for weakly supervised semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds

Journal

COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 427-436

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2023.09.006

Keywords

Point cloud analysis; Semantic segmentation; Consistency training

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semantic segmentation of point cloud usually requires dense annotation, but our PointMatch framework explores data and label information simultaneously, achieving better representation learning and robustness to label sparsity.
Semantic segmentation of point cloud usually relies on dense annotation that is exhausting and costly, so it attracts wide attention to investigate solutions for the weakly supervised scheme with only sparse points annotated. Existing works start from the given labels and propagate them to highly -related but unlabeled points, with the guidance of data, e.g. intra-point relation. However, it suffers from (i) the inefficient exploitation of data information, and (ii) the strong reliance on labels thus is easily suppressed when given much fewer annotations. Therefore, we propose a novel framework, PointMatch, that stands on both data and label, by applying consistency regularization to sufficiently probe information from data itself and leveraging weak labels as assistance at the same time. By doing so, meaningful information can be learned from both data and label for better representation learning, which also enables the model more robust to the extent of label sparsity. Simple yet effective, the proposed PointMatch achieves the state-of-the-art performance under various weakly -supervised schemes on both ScanNet-v2 and S3DIS datasets, especially on the settings with extremely sparse labels, e.g. surpassing SQN by 21.2% and 17.2% on the 0.01% and 0.1% setting of ScanNet-v2, respectively.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available