4.5 Article

Exploring shock-capturing schemes for Particles on Demand simulation of compressible flows

Journal

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105947

Keywords

Particles on demand; Shock-capturing schemes; Total variation diminishing; Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this exploratory study, shock-capturing schemes are applied to simulate compressible flows with shock waves and discontinuities. The model is based on the semi-Lagrangian method and employs concepts like total variation diminishing and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes to capture the discontinuities and shock waves. The results show that the reconstruction schemes effectively remove oscillations at the shock wave location, allowing for stable simulations of compressible benchmarks. The numerical properties of the reconstruction schemes, such as spectral analysis and order of accuracy, are also discussed.
In this exploratory study, we apply shock-capturing schemes within the framework of the Particles on Demand kinetic model to simulate compressible flows with mild and strong shock waves and discontinuities. The model is based on the semi-Lagrangian method, where the information propagates along the characteristics while a set of shock-capturing concepts such as the total variation diminishing and weighted essentially non -oscillatory schemes are employed to capture the discontinuities and the shock-waves. The results show that the reconstruction schemes are able to remove the oscillations at the location of the shock waves and together with the Galilean invariance nature of the Particles on Demand model, stable simulations of mild to extreme compressible benchmarks can be carried out. Moreover, the essential numerical properties of the reconstruction schemes such as their spectral analysis and order of accuracy are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available