4.7 Article

Enhanced energy dissipation of graphene/Cu nanolaminates under extreme strain rate ballistic perforation

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107611

Keywords

Copper; Graphene; Extreme strain rate; Specific energy dissipation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, graphene/copper nanolaminates were fabricated by incorporating graphene into the copper matrix, and their ballistic performance at extreme strain rates was quantified using laser-induced projectile impact tests. The specific energy dissipation of graphene/copper nanolaminates was found to be 54% higher than pure copper. Postmortem analysis revealed that graphene nanoinclusions could cause additional coordinative deformation in regions surrounding the perforation zone in graphene/copper, leading to enhanced ballistic performance.
Dynamic deformations at extreme strain rates (>10(6)/s) are frequently encountered by metallic structural materials. According to continuum theory, increasing the modulus and thus speed of sound in metallic materials could lead to enhanced impact resistance, while such goals are difficult to achieve via conventional alloying methods. On the other hand, recent researches have revealed that carbon materials such as graphene have far larger in-plane speed of sound than metals and therefore are intrinsically impact resistant. In this work, graphene/ copper (Gr/Cu) nanolaminates were fabricated by incorporating graphene into copper matrix, and its ballistic performance at extreme strain rates (similar to 3 x 10(7) /s) was quantified via laser-induced projectile impact tests (LIPITs). The specific energy dissipation of Gr/Cu nanolaminates is found to be 54 % higher than Cu. Postmortem analysis revealed that graphene nanoinclusions could cause additional coordinative deformation in regions surrounding the perforation zone in Gr/Cu, leading to enhanced ballistic performance of Gr/Cu nanolaminates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available