4.5 Article

Return to intended oncologic therapy after colectomy for stage III colon adenocarcinoma: Does surgical approach matter?

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16661

Keywords

adjuvant therapy; colon cancer; minimally invasive colectomy; RIOT; robotic colectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) may allow earlier initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and is associated with shorter time to return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) in patients with resected stage III colon cancer.
Aim: Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) is an important paradigm for surgically resected cancers requiring multimodal treatment. Benefits of minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) may allow earlier initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and have associated survival benefits. We sought to determine if operative approach affects RIOT timing in resected stage III colon cancer.Methods: NCDB identified pathological stage III colon adenocarcinoma patients who underwent resection and received ACT. Propensity score matching and kernel density estimation compared operative approaches and conversion impact on intervals to RIOT.Results: A total of 15,132 open colectomies (OC) versus 14,107 MIC were included. MIC patients had two-days shorter median length of stay (LOS) (4 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001), one-week shorter median time to RIOT (6 vs. 7 weeks; p = 0.015) comparing 12,867 matched pairs. There was no difference in time interval to RIOT between the LC versus RC, converted MIC vs. OC groups. MIC was a favourable predictor of earlier RIOT (HR 1.14 [1.07-1.22]; p < 0.001).Conclusion: MIC in stage III colon cancer is associated with a shorter time to RIOT when compared to OC. Since timely initiation of ACT may influence cancer outcome, MIC may be oncologically preferable. Prospective studies are needed to assess RIOT and survival outcomes in stage III colon cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available