4.7 Article

Fabrication of 3D printed Ca3Mg3(PO4)4-based bioceramic scaffolds with tailorable high mechanical strength and osteostimulation effect

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 229, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113472

Keywords

Magnesium phosphate; Bioceramics; Calcium phosphate; Scaffolds; Bone generation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium calcium phosphate composite bioceramic scaffolds were fabricated using 3D printing technology with Mg3(PO4)2 and β-Ca3(PO4)2 as starting materials. The porosity and compressive strength of the scaffolds could be adjusted by altering the sintering temperature and the formula of starting materials. The Ca3Mg3(PO4)4-based bioceramic scaffolds, prepared from 60 wt% Mg3(PO4)2 and 40 wt% β-Ca3(PO4)2, showed the highest compressive strength and stimulated cellular growth and osteoblastic differentiation.
Calcium, magnesium and phosphate are predominant constituents in the human bone. In this study, magnesium calcium phosphate composite bioceramic scaffolds were fabricated utilizing Mg3(PO4)2 and & beta;-Ca3(PO4)2 as starting materials, and their pore structure was constructed by 3D printing. The porosity and compressive strength of the composite bioceramic scaffolds could be adjusted by altering the sintering temperature and the formula of starting materials. The composite bioceramic scaffolds prepared from 60 wt% Mg3(PO4)2 and 40 wt% & beta;-Ca3(PO4)2 were dominated by the Ca3Mg3(PO4)4 phase, and this Ca3Mg3(PO4)4-based bioceramic scaffolds possessed the highest compressive strength (12.7 - 92.4 MPa). Moreover, the Ca3Mg3(PO4)4-based bioceramic scaffolds stimulated cellular growth and osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. The Ca3Mg3(PO4)4-based bioceramic scaffolds as bone regenerative biomaterials are flexible to the requirement of bone defects at various sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available