4.7 Article

Selective HDAC6 inhibition protects against blood-brain barrier dysfunction after intracerebral hemorrhage

Journal

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cns.14429

Keywords

blood-brain barrier; HDAC6; histone deacetylase inhibitors; intracerebral hemorrhage; tubastatin A

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inhibition of HDAC6 has a protective effect on BBB disruption after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) by upregulating acetylated a-tubulin and reducing stress fiber formation, which suggests that HDAC6 could be a potential target for ICH treatment.
Backgrounds: Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) significantly induces neurological impairment. Previous studies showed that HDAC6 knockdown or TubA can protect the TNF-induced endothelial dysfunction. However, the role of HDAC6 inhibition on ICH-induced BBB disruption remains unknown.Methods: Hemin-induced human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) and collagenase-induced rats were employed to investigated the underlying impact of the HDAC6 inhibition in BBB lesion and neuronal dysfunction after ICH.Results: We found a significant decrease in acetylated a-tubulin during early phase of ICH. Both 25 or 40 mg/kg of TubA could relieve neurological deficits, perihematomal cell apoptosis, and ipsilateral brain edema in ICH animal model. TubA or specific siRNA of HDAC6 inhibited apoptosis and reduced the endothelial permeability of HBMECs. HDAC6 inhibition rescued the degradation of TJ proteins and repaired TJs collapses after ICH induction. Finally, the results suggested that the protective effects on BBB after ICH induction were exerted via upregulating the acetylated a-tubulin and reducing stress fiber formation.Conclusions: Inhibition of HDAC6 expression showed beneficial effects against BBB disruption after experimental ICH, which suggested that HDAC6 could be a novel and promising target for ICH treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available