Journal
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad501
Keywords
tuberculosis; diagnostics; screening; cost-effectiveness; mathematical modelling
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Low-complexity screening tests for tuberculosis (TB) have the potential to expand community-based case-finding efforts, but their costs and cost-effectiveness are not well understood.
Introduction In high-burden settings, low-complexity screening tests for tuberculosis (TB) could expand the reach of community-based case-finding efforts. The potential costs and cost-effectiveness of approaches incorporating these tests are poorly understood.Methods We developed a microsimulation model assessing 3 approaches to community-based case-finding in hypothetical populations (India-, South Africa-, The Philippines-, Uganda-, and Vietnam-like settings) with TB prevalence 4 times that of national estimates: (1) screening with a point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) test, (2) screening with a more sensitive Hypothetical Screening test (95% sensitive for Xpert Ultra-positive TB, 70% specificity; equipment/labor costs similar to Xpert Ultra, but using a $2 cartridge) followed by sputum Xpert Ultra if positive, or (3) testing all individuals with sputum Xpert Ultra. Costs are expressed in 2023 US dollars and include treatment costs.Results Universal Xpert Ultra was estimated to cost a mean $4.0 million (95% uncertainty range: $3.5 to $4.6 million) and avert 3200 (2600 to 3900) TB-related disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100 000 people screened ($670 [The Philippines] to $2000 [Vietnam] per DALY averted). CRP was projected to cost $550 (The Philippines) to $1500 (Vietnam) per DALY averted but with 44% fewer DALYs averted. The Hypothetical Screening test showed minimal benefit compared to universal Xpert Ultra, but if specificity were improved to 95% and per-test cost to $4.5 (all-inclusive), this strategy could cost $390 (The Philippines) to $940 (Vietnam) per DALY averted.Conclusions Screening tests can meaningfully improve the cost-effectiveness of community-based case-finding for TB but only if they are sensitive, specific, and inexpensive. Active case-finding might reduce the tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic gap. We estimate that screening tests could meaningfully improve these active case-finding efforts, but only if they are highly sensitive, specific (approximately 70%-95%), and available at low costs (approaching $4.5/test all-inclusive).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available