4.3 Article

Virtual monoenergetic imaging in photon-counting CT of the head and neck

Journal

CLINICAL IMAGING
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 109-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.08.004

Keywords

Photon counting CT; Virtual monoenergetic imaging; Head and neck CT; Visual grading characteristic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the image quality metrics of virtual monoengetic images (VMI) in photon-counting (PCCT) angiography of the head and neck, expanding the evaluation of anatomical regions and qualitative methods. The study found that the preferred energy levels and quality ratings of VMI varied by anatomical location.
Purpose: Advantages of virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) have been reported for dual energy CT of the head and neck, and more recently VMIs derived from photon-counting (PCCT) angiography of the head and neck. We report image quality metrics of VMI in a PCCT angiography dataset, expanding the anatomical regions evaluated and extending observer-based qualitative methods further than previously reported.Methods: In a prospective study, asymptomatic subjects underwent contrast enhanced PCCT of the head and neck using an investigational scanner. Image sets of low, high, and full spectrum (Threshold-1) energies; linear mix of low and high energies (Mix); and 23 VMIs (40-150 keV, 5 keV increments) were generated. In 8 anatomical locations, SNR and radiologists' preferences for VMI energy levels were measured using a forced-choice rank method (4 observers) and ratings of image quality using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis (2 observers) comparing VMI to Mix and Threshold-1 images.Results: Fifteen subjects were included (7 men, 8 women, mean 57 years, range 46-75). Among all VMIs, SNRs varied by anatomic location. The highest SNRs were observed in VMIs. Radiologists preferred 50-60 keV VMIs for vascular structures and 75-85 keV for all other structures. Cumulative ratings of image quality averaged across all locations were higher for VMIs with areas under the curve of VMI vs Mix and VMI vs Threshold-1 of 0.67 and 0.68 for the first reader and 0.72 and 0.76 for the second, respectively.Conclusion: Preferred keV level and quality ratings of VMI compared to mixed and Threshold-1 images varied by anatomical location.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available