4.3 Article

Morphologic variations of the superior intercostal vein: An anatomical study with clinical applications

Journal

CLINICAL ANATOMY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ca.24106

Keywords

accessory hemi; azygos vein; aortic nipple; complications; superior intercostal vein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study validated and compared the anatomical variations of the superior intercostal veins, analyzing their origin, course, anastomoses, and destination. The study involved dissection and measurement of superior intercostal veins in 50 Korean and 16 Chinese adult cadavers. The findings identified and classified different morphologic types of the superior intercostal vein and highlighted its clinical significance.
This study aimed to validate and compare the anatomical variations of the superior intercostal veins, focusing on their origin, course, anastomoses, and destination. In addition, the results were compared with findings from other relevant studies. Fifty Korean and 16 Chinese adult cadavers were dissected for this study. The superior intercostal veins were dissected and measured. In our study of 66 specimens, the right superior intercostal vein was observed in 92.3% of cases, while the left superior intercostal vein was observed in 50%. The right superior intercostal vein was subdivided into six types based on its composition, which mainly drained the second and third right posterior intercostal veins. Similarly, the left superior intercostal vein was subdivided into eight types, primarily involving the second to fourth left posterior intercostal veins. This detailed anatomical study successfully identified and classified the various morphologic types of the superior intercostal vein and reviewed the clinical significance of this vein. The findings of this study can offer valuable anatomical evidence to physicians, aiding in their understanding and utilization of the superior intercostal vein.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available