4.7 Review

Monocyte distribution width (MDW) in sepsis

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 548, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117511

Keywords

MDW; Sepsis; Infection; Pathogens; Microorganisms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, which can be caused by different types of microorganisms. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) has emerged as a promising biomarker for sepsis, especially in acute settings like the emergency department and intensive care unit. This article explores the relationship between MDW and various pathogens causing infection, suggesting that MDW may be considered a biomarker of sepsis independent of the causative pathogen, but further research is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.
Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome due to a dysregulated host response to infection, which can be caused by bacterial, viral, or fungal infection. Thus, it is crucial to know how the different microorganisms influence the levels of a biomarker. In the last decade, monocyte distribution width (MDW) has emerged as a promising sepsis biomarker, especially in acute settings, such as the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit. In this article, we explore the relationship between MDW and the different pathogens causing infection. Noteworthy, MDW is not a biological molecule, but it is calculated by a mathematical formula based on monocyte characteristics. Monocytes represent the first line defence against microorganisms and undergo activation upon infection, independently from the invading pathogen. According to the knowledge on the biomarker biology and the few literatures evidence, MDW may be considered a biomarker of sepsis, independent of the causative pathogen. However, further investigations are warranted before drawing definite conclusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available