4.5 Article

Structural, electronic and magnetic properties of Fe-doped strontium ruthenates

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS B
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ad0112

Keywords

first-principles calculations; double perovskites; correlation effects; dynamical mean-field theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By employing DFT and DMFT calculations, the structural, electronic, and magnetic characteristics of Sr2RuO4 and SrRuO3 at 50% Fe-doping level are studied, revealing their potential applications in high-performance spintronic devices.
By employing a combined approach of density-functional theory (DFT) and dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) calculations, we examine the structural, electronic, and magnetic characteristics of two distinct strontium ruthenates: Sr2RuO4, an unconventional superconductor, and the correlated metal SrRuO3, both at 50% Fe-doping level. In both Sr2Fe0.5Ru0.5O4 and SrFe0.5Ru0.5O3, the original ruthenium (Ru) and the dopant iron (Fe) atoms adopt 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional G-type structures, respectively. The hybridization between Fe-3d and Ru-4d is comparatively weaker than in other double perovskite systems. The interplay between strong correlations and reduced itinerancy results in significant spin splitting at Fe and Ru sites. Consequently, a charge transfer process, along with the super-exchange effect, leads to antiferromagnetically coupled Fe3+ and Ru5+ ions and establishes a semiconducting ferrimagnetic order. Subsequent DMFT calculations demonstrate the persistence of the ferrimagnetic order even at room temperature (300 K). These findings align with prior reports on SrFe0.5Ru0.5O3, thus reinforcing the notion that 3d-4d transition metal oxides hold considerable promise as candidates for high-performance spintronic devices, such as spin-valve sensors and spintronic giant magnetoresistance devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available