Journal
MEDICINE
Volume 95, Issue 44, Pages -Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005315
Keywords
acute infection; maraviroc; treatment intensification
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health [AI090970, AI120009, AI100665, MH097520, DA034978, MH083552, DA041007, AI118422, AI036214, AI007384, AI096113, AI047745, AI106039, MH100974, HD083042]
- NIH [P30 AI036214]
- NIAID
- NCI
- NIMH
- NIDA
- NICHD
- NHLBI
- NIA
- NIGMS
- NIDDK
- Gilead Sciences
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in early HIV infection demonstrates clinical benefits including enhanced CD4(+) T-lymphocyte recovery and minimization of the latent HIV reservoir. Whether ART intensification with CCR5 blockade provides additional benefits is unknown. Trial design : This randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of maraviroc (MVC) intensification in persons starting ART in acute and early HIV (AEH, within 3 months of estimated date of infection). Methods: Twenty persons in AEH in San Diego underwent double-blind randomization to receive either standard of care (SOC) ART or SOC+MVC to evaluate the hypothesis that early CCR5 blockage with a CCR5-containing ART regimen may provide immunologic and clinical benefit. The primary outcome of this study was the difference from baseline to week 48 in the proportion of CCR5(+)CD4(+) memory T cells. Blood was drawn at baseline and weeks 12, 24, and 48 to evaluate CCR5(+)CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell dynamics using multicolor flow cytometry. Results: MVC intensification (n=10) did not significantly alter CCR5(+) T-cell dynamics at week 48 of study compared to SOC (n=9) in this fully recruited study (mean 1.12 vs 0.63, t=0.36, df=16, P=0.727). Exploratory analyses of additional T-cell subsets suggest that MVC intensification in AEH trended to early greater increases in naive and activated and proliferating CD4(+) T cells (P=0.11, 0.19), and greater decreases in senescent memory CD4(+) T cells (P=0.06), but these differences did not remain by week 48. CD8(+) T-cell evaluations did demonstrate trends to differences at week 48 with slower increases in naive cells and slower decreases in activated memory cells (P=0.16, 0.09). There were no reported harms or significantly different adverse events. Conclusions: We did observe a few trends, but did not find compelling evidence that MVC intensification during AEH significantly impacts CD4(+)and CD8(+) T-cell dynamics. Diagnosing and starting persons in AEH on ART may be of greater clinical importance than the regimen initiated.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available