4.5 Article

Cubic silicon carbide under tensile pressure: Spinodal instability

Journal

CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 573, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2023.112005

Keywords

Silicon carbide; Negative pressure; Molecular dynamics; Spinodal line

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the mechanical properties of 3C-SiC under a wide range of pressures using molecular dynamics simulations. The simulation, based on an effective tight-binding Hamiltonian, showed good agreement with ab-initio density-functional-theory calculations. The results revealed the spinodal instability and metastability limits of the material as a function of temperature, providing insights into the behavior of crystalline semiconductors in unexplored regions of their phase diagrams.
Silicon carbide is a hard, semiconducting material presenting many polytypes, whose behavior under extreme conditions of pressure and temperature has attracted large interest. Here we study the mechanical properties of 3C-SiC over a wide range of pressures (compressive and tensile) by means of molecular dynamics simulations, using an effective tight-binding Hamiltonian to describe the interatomic interactions. The accuracy of this procedure has been checked by comparing results at T = 0 with those derived from ab-initio density-functional-theory calculations. This has allowed us to determine the metastability limits of this material and in particular the spinodal point (where the bulk modulus vanishes) as a function of temperature. At T = 300 K, the spinodal instability appears for a lattice parameter about 20% larger than that corresponding to ambient pressure. At this temperature, we find a spinodal pressure Ps = -43 GPa, which becomes less negative as temperature is raised (Ps = -37.9 GPa at 1500 K). These results pave the way for a deeper understanding of the behavior of crystalline semiconductors in a poorly known region of their phase diagrams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available