Journal
CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 571, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2023.111938
Keywords
Tourmaline; Dyes; Adsorption; Mechanism; Desorption
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the adsorption activity and mechanism of four common types of tourmalines (magnesium-based and iron-based) for cationic and anionic dyes in aqueous solution. The tourmalines displayed electrostatic adsorption for cationic dyes, but very slight adsorption activity for the anionic dye. The large cationic group of one of the dyes hindered its absorption into the tourmaline structure, resulting in weaker absorption activity compared to another dye. Thermal treatment at 350 degrees C effectively desorbed the absorbed cationic dye on select tourmalines.
The adsorption activity and mechanism of four common kinds of tourmalines (magnesium-based tourmaline: mu mMg TM and nm-Mg-TM; iron-based tourmaline: Low-Fe TM and High-Fe TM) for typical cationic dyes (methylene blue: MB and Rhodamine B: RhB) as well as anionic dye (methyl orange: MO) in aqueous solution were investigated. It was found that all of the tourmalines are negatively charged in aqueous solution due to their dissolution of Fe or Mg ions. Accordingly, four types of tourmalines displayed obvious electrostatic adsorption for cationic dyes like MB and RhB, but very slight adsorption activity for MO (anionic dye). Since the cationic group of RhB is too large to be absorbed into the ring structure of tourmalines, weaker RhB absorption activity was observed on the tourmalines, relative to for the absorption of MB. Through thermal treating at 350 degrees C, the absorbed MB on/in high-Fe TM and nm-Mg TM can be well desorbed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available