4.6 Article

Effect of temperature on the hydrodynamics of a fluidized bed circulating in a long tube for a solar energy harvesting application

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 281, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2023.119218

Keywords

Particle-in-tube solar receiver; Particle-driven CSP; Fluidization regimes; Upward dense particle circulation; Heat transfer coefficient; Hydrodynamics of gas -solid flow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The particle-in-tube solar receiver concept for solar towers involves using fluidized particles as heat transfer fluids. Experiments conducted with a single tube irradiated by concentrated solar energy show that the limits and size of the turbulent fluidization regime decrease with temperature, as does the particle volume fraction. The intensity of the wall-to-particle heat transfer is also affected by the fluidization regime.
The particle-in-tube solar receiver concept for solar towers uses fluidized particles as heat transfer fluids. The experiments are conducted with a single tube of aspect ratio H/D = 67 irradiated over a 1-m height using concentrated solar energy. Olivine particles of Geldart's Group A are used. Fluidization regimes are identified thanks to pressure signal analyses, and regime maps are plotted depending on the temperature in the range 150-700 degrees C. Both the local slip Reynolds number and the particle temperature govern the regime transitions. The limits and size of the turbulent fluidization regime domain decrease with temperature. The particle volume fraction also decreases with temperature. Finally, the intensity of the wall-to-particle heat transfer is discussed as a function of the fluidization regimes. As an indicator of the heat transfer intensity, a dimensionless coefficient is derived. This coefficient increases with temperature and exhibits the highest values for the turbulent fluidization regime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available